Commons:Featured picture candidates
Other featured candidates
📽️ Media
|
Featured picture candidates Featured picture candidates are images that the community will vote on, to determine whether or not they will be highlighted as some of the finest on Commons. This page lists the candidates to become featured pictures. The picture of the day images are selected from featured pictures. Old candidates for featured pictures are listed here. There are also chronological lists of featured pictures: 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025, 2026 and current month. For another overview of our finest pictures, take a look at our annual picture of the year election. |
|||||||||||||||||||
Formal thingsNominatingGuidelines for nominatorsPlease read the complete guidelines before nominating. This is a summary of what to look for when submitting and reviewing FP candidates:
Artworks, illustrations, and historical documentsThere are many different types of non-photographic media, including engravings, watercolors, paintings, etchings, and various others. Hence, it is difficult to set hard-and-fast guidelines. However, generally speaking, works can be divided into three types: Those that can be scanned, those that must be photographed, and those specifically created to illustrate a subject. Works that must be photographed include most paintings, sculptures, works too delicate or too unique to allow them to be put on a scanner, and so on. For these, the requirements for photography, below, may be mostly followed; however, it should be noted that photographs which cut off part of the original painting are generally not considered featurable. Works that may be scanned include most works created by processes that allow for mass distribution − for instance, illustrations published with novels. For these, it is generally accepted that a certain amount of extra manipulation is permissible to remove flaws inherent to one copy of the work, since the particular copy – of which hundreds, or even thousands of copies also exist – is not so important as the work itself. Works created to serve a purpose include diagrams, scientific illustrations, and demonstrations of contemporary artistic styles. For these, the main requirement is that they serve their purpose well. Provided the reproduction is of high quality, an artwork generally only needs one of the following four things to be featurable:
Digital restorations must also be well documented. An unedited version of the image should be uploaded locally, when possible, and cross-linked from the file description page. Edit notes should be specified in detail, such as "Rotated and cropped. Dirt, scratches, and stains removed. Histogram adjusted and colors balanced." PhotographsOn the technical side, we have focus, exposure, composition, movement control and depth of field.
On the graphic elements we have shape, volume, color, texture, perspective, balance, proportion, noise, etc.
You will maximise the chances of your nominations succeeding if you read the complete guidelines before nominating. Video and audioPlease nominate videos, sounds, music, PDFs, etc. at Commons:Featured media candidates. Set nominationsIf a group of images are thematically connected in a direct and obvious way, they can be nominated together as a set. A set should fall under one of the following types:
Adding a new nominationIf you believe that you have found or created an image that could be considered valuable, with appropriate name, quality, image description, categories and licensing, then do the following. Step 1: copy the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Your image filename.jpg. Then click on the "create new nomination" button. All single files: For renominations, simply add /2 after the filename. For example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Foo.jpg/2
All set nomination pages should begin "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/", e.g. "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/My Nomination".
Step 3: manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list: Click here, and add the following line to the TOP of the nominations list:
Nominations are time-sensitive and for one-time use only. An automatic clock starts as soon as they are created. Do not create them in advance, save them for later or re-activate them. Galleries and FP categories: Please add a gallery page and section heading from the list at Commons FP galleries. Write the code as Page name#Section heading. For example: Optional: if you are not the creator of the image, please notify them using
An 'Alternative' is created by adding a sub-section to the nomination page: ====Alternative==== VotingEditors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 100 constructive, stable edits on Commons (excluding user and talk pages) can vote. Everybody can vote for their own nominations. Anonymous (IP) votes are not allowed. You may use the following templates:
You may indicate that the image has no chance of success with the template {{FPX|reason - ~~~~}}, where reason explains why the image is clearly unacceptable as a FP. The template can only be used when there are no support votes other than the one from the nominator. A well-written review helps participants (photographers, nominators and reviewers) improve their skills by providing insight into the strengths and weaknesses of a picture. Explain your reasoning, especially when opposing a candidate (which has been carefully selected by the author/nominator). English is the most widely understood language on Commons, but any language may be used in your review. A helpful review will often reference one or more of the criteria listed above. Unhelpful reasons for opposing include:
Remember also to put your signature (~~~~). Featured picture delisting candidatesOver time, featured picture standards change. It may be decided that for some pictures which were formerly "good enough", this is no longer the case. This is for listing an image which you believe no longer deserves to be a featured picture. For these, vote:
This can also be used for cases in which a previous version of an image was promoted to FP, but a newer version of the image has been made and is believed to be superior to the old version, e.g. a newly edited version of a photo or a new scan of a historical image. In particular, it is not intended for replacing older photos of a particular subject with newer photos of the same subject, or in any other case where the current FP and the proposed replacement are essentially different images. For these nominations, vote:
If you believe that some picture no longer meets the criteria for FP, you can nominate it for delisting, copying the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box: In the new delisting nomination page just created you should include:
After that, you have to manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list. As a courtesy, leave an informative note on the talk page(s) of the original creator, uploader(s), and nominator with a link to the delisting candidate. {{subst:FPC-notice-removal}} can be used for this purpose. Featured picture candidate policyGeneral rules
Featuring and delisting rulesA candidate will become a featured picture in compliance with following conditions:
The delisting rules are the same as those for FPs, with voting taking place over the same time period. The rule of the 5th day is applied to delisting candidates that have received no votes to delist, other than that of the proposer, by day 5. The FPCBot handles the vote counting and closing in most cases, current exceptions are candidates containing multiple versions of the image as well as FPXed and withdrawn nominations. Any experienced user may close the requests not handled by the bot. For instructions on how to close nominations, see Commons:Featured picture candidates/What to do after voting is finished. Also note that there is a manual review stage between when the bot has counted the votes and before the nomination is finally closed by the bot; this manual review can be done by any user familiar with the voting rules. Above all, be politePlease don't forget that the image you are judging is somebody's work. Avoid using phrases like "it looks terrible" and "I hate it". If you must oppose, please do so with consideration. Also remember that your command of English might not be the same as someone else's. Choose your words with care. Happy judging… and remember… all rules can be broken. See also
| |||||||||||||||||||
Table of contents
All users eligible to vote on FPC are invited to vote on this page.
The voting is open until 17 March 2026 23:59:59 (UTC).
Featured picture candidates
Voting period ends on 18 Mar 2026 at 19:52:52 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Work#Others
Info Mundari young man polishing the horns of one of his Watusi cows using a mixture of cow urine and ash as a ritualistic and protective practice in a temporary cattle camp in Terekeka, South Sudan. The Mundari are a small ethnic group of South Sudan that belong to the Karo. They have a symbiotic relationship with their Ankole-Watusi cattle, using the animals as a vital source of wealth, food, and spiritual connection, rather than for meat. The cows are central to Mundari life, providing milk for sustenance, dung for fuel (when burned to produce smoke that keeps mosquitoes and other insects away) and ash (used as a repellent and for cosmetic purposes), and acting as a form of currency for dowries. Herders dedicate their lives to protecting the prized Ankole-Watusi cows, sleeping alongside, viewing them as a living bank and a source of profound cultural significance. Poco a poco (talk) 19:52, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 19:52, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Mar 2026 at 18:04:04 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Work#Artisans_(craftspeople)
Info Berberic painter drawing a bookmark, Ouarzazate, Morocco. My shot. -- Mile (talk) 18:04, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Mile (talk) 18:04, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Comment From my experience on COM:DR, I fear the photo could be deleted because of copyright concerns over the painting, unless the author gives express written permission for the shot to be used commercially. Commons usage rights requirements are very onerous. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:19, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Comment From my experience you are wrong again. I forgot PR, added. Which copyright are you concerned about ? --Mile (talk) 19:17, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Mar 2026 at 09:42:31 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Coraciiformes#Family_:_Meropidae_(Bee-eaters)
Info created by Giles Laurent – uploaded by Giles Laurent – nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:42, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:42, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:09, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support---Famberhorst (talk) 16:39, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Excellent! Could you add the sex of either the bird and/or dragonfly? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:16, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Done for the dragonfly. As for the European bee-eaters they don't have a strong sexual dimorphism so I can't tell for sure if it's a male or female -- Giles Laurent (talk) 18:20, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 17:18, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 17:19, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 17:35, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:10, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Mar 2026 at 09:09:48 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Psittacidae_(True_(African_and_New_World)_Parrots)
Info created by Giles Laurent – uploaded by Giles Laurent – nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:09, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:09, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:09, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support---Famberhorst (talk) 16:40, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support. Can you add a category for the tree? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:19, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Done -- Giles Laurent (talk) 18:14, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 17:20, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 17:36, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support I like the similarity between the yellow beak and palm plant. JayCubby (talk) 18:29, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:10, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Mar 2026 at 08:43:48 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Traditions
Info all by -- IssamBarhoumi (talk) 08:43, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Poor lighting in the foreground. CutlassCiera 15:32, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Mar 2026 at 06:53:26 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Georgia
Info created by David1010 – uploaded by David1010 – nominated by David1010 -- David1010 06:53, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- David1010 06:53, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Comment Interesting church and it deserves a FP, but the cross shouldn't block part of the building imho. Also, I think that perspective correction is needed here (the building is leaning back). Юрий Д.К. 17:18, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Comment WB is also pretty off. Also isnt so sharp, like focus was on cross. --Mile (talk) 18:09, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Mar 2026 at 06:50:24 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Oriolidae_(Old_World_oriole)
Info All by -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 06:50, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 06:50, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:32, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:59, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:11, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Nice. --Famberhorst (talk) 16:42, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support I don't know how big this bird is, but I surely believe it looks good at a larger-than-life size. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:27, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 17:50, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Great detail, not overprocessed. JayCubby (talk) 18:33, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:10, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Mar 2026 at 05:19:58 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Asterales#Subfamily : Asteroideae
Info Seed bundle from a Helenium 'El Dorado in March. Focus stack of 19 photos. A nearly full seed bundle from a Helenium 'El Dorado' in March. Some ripe seeds have now become detached from the bundle. (Diameter of the seed bundle ~14mm.)
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:19, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:19, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 06:51, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:32, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:12, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Another great closeup of a part of a plant. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:29, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support I would put diameter into description, since many wont know about "annotations". More important than stack number. --Mile (talk) 18:08, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
- Thanks for your suggestion. I've added the diameter to the description.--Famberhorst (talk) 18:25, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:13, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Mar 2026 at 04:18:16 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Tools
Info created by Frank Schulenburg – uploaded by Frank Schulenburg – nominated by Frank Schulenburg --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 04:18, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 04:18, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 04:43, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Elegant composition; textured stone contrasts beautifully with the refined steel and figured wood handle, emphasizing form and craftsmanship. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:10, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 06:51, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 08:42, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:31, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:57, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support- Per Radomianin--Famberhorst (talk) 16:36, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 17:11, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support To be honest I had expected a japanese blade... Poco a poco (talk) 20:14, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Comment Poco a poco: Do you think it might be worth nominating this one as well? --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 20:22, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Mar 2026 at 21:11:46 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Canada
Info The "steeple", for lack of a better word, of the Essex Gospel Community Church in Essex, Ontario, Canada. I think this is a pleasing combination of straight lines and minimal colours (only two colours, plus black and white). All by Crisco 1492 -- — Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:11, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- — Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:11, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Striking architectural minimalism with strong graphic impact. Clean geometric forms guide the eye toward the cross, creating a powerful vertical emphasis. The white structure contrasts beautifully with the blue sky, while the narrow red accent provides a subtle visual anchor. Technically very well executed, with precise lines, balanced exposure, and excellent color rendering. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:37, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Comment Excellent composition and colours. I will gladly support after the noisy sky is fixed. Alvesgaspar (talk) 22:37, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Comment +1 --Aciarium (talk) 22:42, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Comment +1 – Julian Lupyan (talk) 23:54, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
- Hi Alvesgaspar, Aciarium, and Julian Lupyan. I have denoised the image. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 03:29, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support – Julian Lupyan (talk) 16:13, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
- Hi Alvesgaspar, Aciarium, and Julian Lupyan. I have denoised the image. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 03:29, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Great! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 23:53, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Strong support Per Radomianin. Beautiful geometric composition. --Aciarium (talk) 07:37, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:28, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:31, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Very good compo, and that red part make it through. --Mile (talk) 13:39, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Per others.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:46, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:15, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Mar 2026 at 17:26:31 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers#Russia
Info Front complete view of Spasskaya Tower, built in 1491. Taken during a morning when the Red Square is free of people. My photo Юрий Д.К. 17:26, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 17:26, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Very striking. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 18:54, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:03, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Comment Perspective correction is overdone. If it were really a frontal view, then the watch would be round, but here it is oval. It looks unnatural. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 23:00, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
- It looks like as oval from this point of view. Here the photo from similar angle. The clock would look round if you stood far away from the tower or took a picture with a drone. So, I disagree that PC is overdone. Юрий Д.К. 23:14, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
- ...Or you can just move away and use the zoom to make the image look more natural :) I'm not voting against your photo, but I do have my opinion. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 23:50, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
- It looks like as oval from this point of view. Here the photo from similar angle. The clock would look round if you stood far away from the tower or took a picture with a drone. So, I disagree that PC is overdone. Юрий Д.К. 23:14, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:30, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:56, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Comment @Юрий Д.К. I think you should make rescale, putting more to vertical, so that clock is probably rounded. I would add some sky above and resize some pixles. Otherwise OK shot. --Mile (talk) 13:43, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Per Mile.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:48, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:15, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Mar 2026 at 16:12:09 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1940-1949
Info created by Max Desfor, restored, uploaded, and nominated by Yann
Info Jawaharlal Nehru sharing a joke with Mahatma Gandhi, during a meeting of the All India Congress, Mumbai, July 6, 1946. On the left is Vijaya Lakshmi Pandit, Nehru's sister.
Support Thanks to JayCubby for finding the high resolution copy. -- Yann (talk) 16:12, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support And thanks to Yann for so nicely restoring it! JayCubby (talk) 17:22, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:04, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support High encyclopedic value, captures a historically significant moment. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:42, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support ★ 22:21, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support per others; a great nomination! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:16, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:18, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:29, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Mar 2026 at 15:25:44 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/1900s#1980-1989
Info Yemen's capital Sanaa before its unification (note the flag on the building). Created by mwanasimba – uploaded by File Upload Bot (Magnus Manske) – nominated by ★ -- ★ 15:25, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support A little small but historically important. -- ★ 15:25, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Mar 2026 at 14:19:29 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Sitting_people
Info Mundari kid representing the horns with his hands sitting on a pile of burnt cow dung and surrounded by Watusi cows in a temporary cattle camp in Terekeka, South Sudan. The Mundari are a small ethnic group of South Sudan that belong to the Karo. They have a symbiotic relationship with their Ankole-Watusi cattle, using the animals as a vital source of wealth, food, and spiritual connection, rather than for meat. The cows are central to Mundari life, providing milk for sustenance, dung for fuel (when burned to produce smoke that keeps mosquitoes and other insects away) and ash (used as a repellent and for cosmetic purposes), and acting as a form of currency for dowries. Herders dedicate their lives to protecting the prized Ankole-Watusi cows, sleeping alongside, viewing them as a living bank and a source of profound cultural significance. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 14:19, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 14:19, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Great photo! This belongs, of course, to the same series as the recent winner of POTY 2024. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 14:58, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Jakubhal 15:48, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Thanks for the picture, and the detailed explanation. --Yann (talk) 16:23, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 16:41, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Beautiful RiadS99 (talk) 17:29, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 18:28, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 18:55, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Your Sudan pictures are amazing. JayCubby (talk) 19:12, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Very good.--Ermell (talk) 20:38, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:04, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Striking! -- Radomianin (talk) 21:38, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support per others. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:19, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support - Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 06:38, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:27, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Mile (talk) 13:46, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Mar 2026 at 13:49:04 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Industry#Austria
Info Nightly view of blast furnace no. 1 of the Donawitz steelworks, Leoben, Austria. Image by me. -- Aciarium (talk) 13:49, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Aciarium (talk) 13:49, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Very good. This reminds me of File:Edward Weston, Armco Steel, Ohio, 1922, MoMA.jpg. Yann (talk) 17:51, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Wow. Great black-and-white work! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 18:28, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Good motiv but unfortunately not sharp enough. Sorry.--Ermell (talk) 20:42, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Sufficiently sharp for me. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:05, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Beautiful night shot. --Selbymay (talk) 22:12, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support per others. Artistic. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:22, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:45, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:15, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:26, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 17:05, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Per Ermell, a shame, otherwise great Poco a poco (talk) 20:17, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Mar 2026 at 13:51:32 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Trucks_and_buses
Info A MAN TGA 18.360 clearing snow in Leoben, Austria. Image by me. -- Aciarium (talk) 13:51, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Aciarium (talk) 13:51, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Mar 2026 at 22:38:41 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Coraciiformes#Family_:_Meropidae_(Bee-eaters)
Info created & uploaded by Sven Damerow – nominated by Señor Aluminio -- Alu (talk) 22:38, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Alu (talk) 22:38, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Comment Branch has a funny texture due to AI processing being applied to an OOF object. JayCubby (talk) 22:49, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:43, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 08:44, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Comment Excellent picture that I will happily support once what Jay pointed out is fixed -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:35, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Comment Thank you for your comments. The photograph is not mine and I’m not very experienced with image editing, just an amateur. If you think it is worthwhile and not too difficult, please feel free to improve the image. Thank you.Alu (talk) 10:12, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Alternative
Info In this version, the branch texture has been slightly smoothed.
Comment @JayCubby: @Giles Laurent: Maybe it's better now? --Alu (talk) 16:40, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Mar 2026 at 21:19:36 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Historical/1900s#1940-1949
Info created by unknown Navy employee – uploaded by JayCubby – nominated by JayCubby -- JayCubby (talk) 21:19, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Support The contrast/tone isn't great but I felt it was an interesting capture, even with the OOF object (helmet? post?) in the corner. -- JayCubby (talk) 21:19, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Oppose The distracting foreground makes this historical picture unexceptional in my opinion -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:34, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
- I feared as much. @Basile Morin, would you prefer a partial crop? (Inpainting would be tricky, and inauthentic). JayCubby (talk) 02:00, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
- Sorry, no -- Basile Morin (talk) 08:31, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Oppose I agree. Historically significant and an amazing sight but not an FP. I'd consider a crop that shows just the plane. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:57, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Per others. I don't think cropping would help much since the resolution at this crop is already not too high. --Aciarium (talk) 13:54, 8 March 2026 (UTC)- Thanks all for the feedback.
I withdraw my nomination. JayCubby (talk) 17:21, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Mar 2026 at 20:49:25 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Others
Info Used 135 film cartridges, workshop in Belgrade, Serbia. My shot. -- Mile (talk) 20:49, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Mile (talk) 20:49, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Support That's a lot of film! JayCubby (talk) 21:23, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Oppose It's a lot of film, but the composition feels random to me and is not working for me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:14, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Different composition. ★ 17:49, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 19:07, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:06, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 17:04, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Mar 2026 at 15:12:45 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Seychelles
Info created, uploaded and nominated by -- Norbert Nagel (talk) 15:12, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Norbert Nagel (talk) 15:12, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Comment Use categories. They cost nothing (believe it or not!!) and each one is an added value. --A.Savin 18:44, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Comment
Done Юрий Д.К. 10:58, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 10:29, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Comment Thank you for the comment. I now added 3 categories: "Boats at sunset", "Photographic silhouettes of boats" and "Photographic silhouettes of people against sunsets". The photo now has a total of 11 categories (not including the hidden and temporary categories). -- Norbert Nagel (talk) 11:04, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Categories are satisfactory to me. This is quite an unusual aspect ratio, but I think it works well with the scenery. Beautiful light and colors. --Aciarium (talk) 13:58, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support ★ 17:51, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:45, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:45, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:08, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:24, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Scutarcopagia linguafelis (Cat’s Tongue Tellin), valves
Voting period ends on 16 Mar 2026 at 13:04:42 (UTC)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page
-
Right valve
-
Left valve
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Shells#Family : Tellinidae
Info The English name "Cat's Tongue Tellin" and the scientific name ("linguafelis" = cat's tongue) refer to the surface of the valves, which strongly resembles a cat's tongue; created by Llez – uploaded by Llez – nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 13:04, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Llez (talk) 13:04, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Aptly named shell, excellent photo by Zell. JayCubby (talk) 17:53, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:09, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:50, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Great shell photography as usual. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:04, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support excellent work --Berthold Werner (talk) 14:15, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:06, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:44, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:23, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Mile (talk) 13:47, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Mar 2026 at 08:39:02 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Agriculture#Morocco
Info Freshly-ploughed fields in the Daya Chiker polje (depression) bordered by dolomite cliffs. Created by Tagooty – uploaded by Tagooty – nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 08:39, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Tagooty (talk) 08:39, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- BlueRockThrush (talk) 16:03, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 10:31, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Comment It's a pretty scene, but I'm not sure about the right crop and would like a slightly more generous crop on the near side of the picture frame, if possible. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:16, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek: This is the original uncropped image, and is the best I have of that scene. --Tagooty (talk) 14:38, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
- OK. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:54, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek: This is the original uncropped image, and is the best I have of that scene. --Tagooty (talk) 14:38, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Mar 2026 at 07:02:42 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#United Kingdom,
Info Brutalist architectural detail on Salters' Hall in London. Created and uploaded by Julian Herzog. Nominated by -- ArildV (talk) 07:02, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- ArildV (talk) 07:02, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Oppose I understand the idea, but not really working for me Poco a poco (talk) 09:57, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 14:26, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Agree. Compo is a bit out. Too many elements of architecture, black should be more in or completely out, view could be beter. --Mile (talk) 17:29, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Oppose I agree, I don't see anything that makes the image captivating or FP-level, mainly due to the composition and the dominant color scheme. HurricaneZetaC 22:45, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Composition is certainly unusual, but this is what makes this image interesting to look at. FP to me. --Aciarium (talk) 14:00, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Mar 2026 at 21:40:45 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers#China
Info Drum Tower of Tianjin. All by me -- Ermell (talk) 21:40, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Ermell (talk) 21:40, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Support As I said. ★ 22:38, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 23:44, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Comment Looks ok, but the most interesting areas of the picture are too dark. Poco a poco (talk) 09:59, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 14:27, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
- @★ @Kiril Simeonovski @Poco a poco @Юрий Д.К. I tried to lighten the shadows a little.--Ermell (talk) 20:48, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
- Also good. ★ 21:10, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
- Looks fine to me. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 23:42, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
- @★ @Kiril Simeonovski @Poco a poco @Юрий Д.К. I tried to lighten the shadows a little.--Ermell (talk) 20:48, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Oppose too tight crop left and right. --Jebulon (talk) 23:23, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
- It's on point, in my view. ★ 03:07, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
- I
Support this version with somewhat brightened shadows. Really beautiful architecture in detail. Nice to see you, Jebulon! I find the crops adequate, but I'd love to see a photo of this tower by you if you have any. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:22, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:43, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 06:09, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:05, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:23, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Mar 2026 at 19:04:40 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Italy#Trentino-Alto Adige
Info Valle della Rienza and Tre Cime di Lavaredo as seen from Alpe Specie, Val Pusteria, Italy. Created, uploaded and nominated by Ximonic -- Ximonic (talk) 19:04, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Abstain -- Ximonic (talk) 19:04, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Great!--Ermell (talk) 21:34, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Strong support Ximonic's photos never disappoint. ★ 00:24, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 01:06, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:53, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Jakubhal 05:47, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --ArildV (talk) 07:05, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Majestic mountain scene --Tagooty (talk) 08:34, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 10:00, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:06, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 14:29, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 17:03, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Top-right rock formation looks almost manmade. JayCubby (talk) 18:48, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Comment Is it just me, or is the image slightly tilted cw? --Aciarium (talk) 14:03, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
- I don't think so. The only reliable available info is the small house near the right margin, which lools vertical to me . -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 15:45, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
- The sediment deposits are more or less slanted everywhere in these mountains which is a bit tricky when finding a horizon. I think of trying to concider the trees, although sometimes they can be misleading too... I seem to have taken many photos in this angle, so I guess it's pretty much "there". --Ximonic (talk) 04:28, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 23:14, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:42, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Wow! -- Radomianin (talk) 06:14, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Beautiful view and lightint -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:22, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Mar 2026 at 18:58:54 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles#Automobiles
Info A yellow Fiat Nuova 500 on a street in San Marino. Created, uploaded and nominated by -- DILIN (talk) 18:58, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- DILIN (talk) 18:58, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Oppose The idea is not bad, but the compo (centered) is boring and the resolution is far too low Poco a poco (talk) 10:01, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
- In this case, a central composition is appropriate because the object itself is static. Movement or adding some kind of dynamism makes no sense. DILIN (talk) 11:59, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Support I like it. --Petro Stelte (talk) 15:53, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Oppose I'm distracted by the reflections on the side of the car, which to my mind ruin a composition that would have otherwise worked for me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:24, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for your opinion. You may be right, but unfortunately, this was an unstaged shoot, and I had no control over the surroundings. DILIN (talk) 17:52, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
- Of course I understand that. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:57, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for your opinion. You may be right, but unfortunately, this was an unstaged shoot, and I had no control over the surroundings. DILIN (talk) 17:52, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Comment @DILIN i think pic is good, but you made large crop, around 1600 px wide, so pic become a bit small. While i think car should made much more % of frame, so more crop, but i suppose you would like to have "italian backgorund" - stones etc. I have similar just more edge to edge and from lower position. --Mile (talk) 19:42, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Mar 2026 at 05:37:42 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Reliefs
Info created and uploaded by Joydeep – nominated by UnpetitproleX (Talk) 05:37, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- UnpetitproleX (Talk) 05:37, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
- An aside: the motif is quite famous in India because it appears on Indian currency notes. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 06:41, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Well done. --Yann (talk) 19:31, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 21:36, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 06:43, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Support High quality image of an important motif. --Tagooty (talk) 08:35, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Comment We don't have yet a FP of the Konark temple, which is surprising. The place deserves it, no doubt. I find though a bit annoying that you were not perfectly in front of it but a bit to the right of the wheel. Furthermore, it needs some perspective adjustments, which could be explained by the POV, not sure Poco a poco (talk) 10:08, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:04, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 14:31, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 08:30, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:41, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:21, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Mar 2026 at 02:07:43 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Religion#Hinduism
Info created by anonymous painter c. 1760 – photographed at the Met, uploaded by BotMultichillT – nominated by UnpetitproleX (Talk) 02:07, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Typical Rajput miniature of Radha Krishna, from eighteenth century, good quality reproduction. -- UnpetitproleX (Talk) 02:07, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 09:43, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Support per nom. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:00, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 14:33, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:48, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 08:30, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:07, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:40, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:21, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Mar 2026 at 00:03:34 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#North Macedonia
Info created by Деан Лазаревски – uploaded by Kiril Simeonovski – nominated by Kiril Simeonovski -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 00:03, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 00:03, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Comment Interesting, but some
chromatic aberration, maybe the author can be stirred out of inactivity to provide the RAW? JayCubby (talk) 01:13, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Done Chromatic aberration removed. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 07:55, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
- Thanks,
Support JayCubby (talk) 23:05, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
- Thanks,
Comment An alternative version from the same photo session is this one from a slightly different perspective. Please advise if you find it more appealing. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 10:21, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Both perspectives are good. Interesting shape. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:02, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Support ★ 22:42, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 14:34, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 08:29, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:07, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:20, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Mar 2026 at 23:54:24 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Upupidae_(Hoopoes)
Info created & uploaded by Sven Damerow – nominated by Alu -- Alu (talk) 23:54, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Alu (talk) 23:54, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Good catch by the photographer and the bird, which is pretty. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:42, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 09:40, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
* Signature missing --Berthold Werner (talk) 16:39, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Support 10:59, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Support A wonderful picture, both the subject and the background. Alvesgaspar (talk) 14:38, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Support. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕️ 16:13, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Absolute --Berthold Werner (talk) 16:39, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 17:57, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Great pose. – Aristeas (talk) 18:54, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 20:14, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 06:45, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 10:10, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:02, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 14:35, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:08, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:40, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support - Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 06:39, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:19, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Mar 2026 at 21:16:11 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/1900s#1980-1989
Info I just cannot believe that this beautiful and powerful photo wasn't yet FP nor VI, guys... (I tought it was in the past, really strange... maybe just on local wikipedia projects; I just stumbled on it after some year and immediately nominated it now)/// created by the DoD-USAF – uploaded by Makthorpe & TomStar81 (current high res.) – nominated by LucaLindholm -- LucaLindholm (talk) 21:16, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- LucaLindholm (talk) 21:16, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Yeah, this is a striking sight, and before anyone says it's not that sharp, is it sharp enough to you for a 1984 photo of such a sight? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:44, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Support This used to be my profile picture in school! Fascinating photograph with the conflict of colors and texture. GGOTCC (talk) 07:49, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Support. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕️ 16:14, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Oppose I don't like the too tight crop, especially on the left side. Alvesgaspar (talk) 23:55, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Oppose The crop. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:54, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Very good quality for 1984 and has a wow factor for me. Юрий Д.К. 08:23, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Lots of potential here but per above, crop and also lack of sharpness Poco a poco (talk) 10:12, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Tight crop. Should be all in. --Mile (talk) 17:31, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Weak oppose Composition/crop aren't that much an issue to me. Resolution however is poor. --Aciarium (talk) 14:04, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Impressive shot and high value. --Selbymay (talk) 22:07, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 06:08, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Oppose per others. --Yann (talk) 17:53, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Mar 2026 at 17:20:02 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Brazil
Info Pedra Azul (Portuguese for "Blue Stone"), in the Pedra Azul State Park, Espírito Santo, Brazil. Created, uploaded and nominated by ★ -- ★ 17:20, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
Support The cloudy sky is not a problem here, in my opinion. -- ★ 17:20, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Good quality and a remarkable geological formation. I agree that the cloudy sky isn’t a problem here. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 17:54, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
- It is one of the most iconic landmarks in the Brazilian state of Espírito Santo. ★ 19:43, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
- I hope to visit it one day. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 20:06, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
Comment Rather soft at 1:1 zoom. The hill shape reminds me of Syntaxys's File:2009-08-27 D100-08 Achim-Lammerts Estergebirge-Krottenkopf.jpg. JayCubby (talk) 20:58, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
- The main difference: the Syntaxys's image compositionally centers on the gap of the Krottenkopf; here we have a centered crop of another peak itself. ★ 22:57, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
- I see a sine wave in both. JayCubby (talk) 23:21, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
- The crest and trough! Lol ★ 00:42, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
- I see a sine wave in both. JayCubby (talk) 23:21, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
- The main difference: the Syntaxys's image compositionally centers on the gap of the Krottenkopf; here we have a centered crop of another peak itself. ★ 22:57, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Well, specially dealing with one of the most iconic landmarks in the state it deserves a better pictures. This one is grey, with a centered/boring composition, detail is low and the POV is not the best, sorry. Poco a poco (talk) 10:14, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Not QI level of quality and mediocre light conditions. But an interesting formation. --A.Savin 18:56, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Oppose per others. My apologies, but other than the rock itself, nothing strikes me as outstanding about this photo, neither the sharpness, the light, the background nor even the crop on the left, where the incline does not help the composition. Although there are also issues of quality (that is, not FP) and the crops are a little tight left and right in File:Caminho para a Pedra Azul.jpg, I prefer its composition. I really hope this remark doesn't come across as insulting and that you instead see it as a challenge to try to continue photographing this landmark and working to produce a really wonderful result that will be an FP, and I look forward to seeing it! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:35, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek: so I don't understand why this photo was promoted to QI. What's happening in that section? ★ 12:06, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
- I couldn't say because I haven't been frequenting QIC, but it seems like FPC has higher standards. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:30, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek: so I don't understand why this photo was promoted to QI. What's happening in that section? ★ 12:06, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Mar 2026 at 12:15:39 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Sweden
Info Former firestation in Vaxholm after heavy snowfall with the old bell tower and water tower in the background. I am very happy with the composition here, with the three red towers and the contrast with the white snow. Created, uploaded and nominated by-- ArildV (talk) 12:15, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- ArildV (talk) 12:15, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 15:13, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 15:29, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 18:03, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Picturesque and well-composed. – Aristeas (talk) 18:53, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Oppose It's a pretty house with snow, but I miss something else here to consider it extraordinary. Sorry Arild Poco a poco (talk) 10:16, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Oppose I agree with this. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:12, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:01, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 22:14, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Mar 2026 at 07:15:16 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#United Kingdom
Info Autumn landscape at Loch Tummel, Perth and Kinross, Scotland. Created by Eric Kilby – uploaded/nominated by me. Юрий Д.К. 07:15, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 07:15, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Nice reflection, beautiful colors. --Yann (talk) 10:22, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 13:01, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
Support That's just so appealing. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:15, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 06:52, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Support. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕️ 16:14, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Oppose I miss the necessary sharpness --Berthold Werner (talk) 16:41, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Glorious colours and reflection. --Tagooty (talk) 08:41, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Agree, a great view but disappointing sharpness, clearly below FP level. A shame. Poco a poco (talk) 10:15, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Done The photo has been denoised carefully. Юрий Д.К. 10:55, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:46, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support This version is acceptable. Beautiful autumn atmosphere.--Ermell (talk) 20:52, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 23:14, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:17, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Mar 2026 at 02:03:16 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Air_transport#Military_jet_aircraft
Info What if... the nuclear wessels were in the air? That's what the US Air Force attempted to explore in the 1950s with the Convair NB-36H, which carried a nuclear reactor to test its shielding and show the feasibility of a nuclear-powered bomber. Ultimately, after fifteen years, they never got around to actually powering an aircraft with a nuclear reactor, and John F. Kennedy killed the program. Created by the United States Air Force – uploaded and nominated by Crisco 1492 -- — Chris Woodrich (talk) 02:03, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- — Chris Woodrich (talk) 02:03, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Historical importance, cannot be taken again. Yann (talk) 10:20, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Also a good photo with an excellent composition and well denoised. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:17, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:05, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Support. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕️ 16:14, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 10:34, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 11:10, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Valuable motif, good execution, pleasing to look at. --Aciarium (talk) 14:06, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:38, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:17, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Mar 2026 at 23:24:28 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Yemen
Info Houses in Sana'a, Yemen. Created by Rod Waddington – firstly uploaded by File Upload Bot (Magnus Manske) – edited and nominated by ★ -- ★ 23:24, 4 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Great documentation since the city is a war zone now. -- ★ 23:24, 4 March 2026 (UTC)
Comment Seems to have a purple tinge. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 02:04, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
- Not entirely; just the window courtains. ★ 02:37, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
- @Crisco 1492:
Edited. ★ 14:55, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
- Still very purple. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:37, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Ok. ★ 15:24, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
- Still very purple. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:37, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
- @Crisco 1492:
- Not entirely; just the window courtains. ★ 02:37, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Mar 2026 at 21:11:29 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Natural_phenomena#Crepuscular_rays
Info A moody morning in Drenthe near Aalden. Visible are crepuscular rays . Wide angle view with grass in the foreground sun behind a raw of trees.
Info all by me -- Tuxyso (talk) 21:11, 4 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Tuxyso (talk) 21:11, 4 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 22:06, 4 March 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 02:05, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 09:13, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 10:21, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
Support. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕️ 16:15, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Beautiful, nice mood. – Aristeas (talk) 21:49, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 10:28, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 11:10, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:37, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Oppose I like the warm sunlight like everyone else, but the composition does not work for me. It's really right-heavy (by analogy with top-heavy). For the most part, I want a great photograph to not merely show a notable phenomenon but be pleasant or interesting for my eyes to move around the entire picture frame. This is definitely a pretty scene and was worthwhile to photograph, but I dissent on it being an outstanding work, overall. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:41, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Composition is not satisfying. In short, Ikan Kekek said it all before me... Alvesgaspar (talk) 15:05, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Comment Ikan Kekek, Alvesgaspar: The composition is built around an ascending row of trees from left to right, following the direction of the sun rays. The sun acts as the main focal point and is balanced by the woodpile in the lower right, both placed roughly along the golden ratio. The light rays and the tree line guide the viewer’s eye through the image from left to right, creating visual flow and depth. As with any photograph, the perception of this balance also contains a subjective element. --Tuxyso (talk) 05:16, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:17, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Mar 2026 at 20:51:28 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Interiors#Germany
Info all by me -- Tuxyso (talk) 20:51, 4 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Tuxyso (talk) 20:51, 4 March 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 02:05, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
SupportThe shadows could be raised a little more. --Ermell (talk) 09:16, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
Support but could be a bit brighter --Uoaei1 (talk) 09:57, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
Conditionalsupport as per above. JayCubby (talk) 14:30, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
- Thanks for the fix, it looks less gloomy now. JayCubby (talk) 22:03, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
Comment Thanks for the reviews up to now. I have brightened up the shadows a bit. Keep in mind that the wooden interior has also a very dark brown color in reality. Nonetheless a slight brightning was a good idea here, thanks for thind. Please take another look, Chris Woodrich, Ermell, Uoaei1, JayCubby --Tuxyso (talk) 21:31, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:51, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:33, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Support The dark tone doesn't bother me, it adds to the mood. Alvesgaspar (talk) 23:58, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 06:32, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Comment Upon taking a closer look at the photo again, I noticed a strange dotted pattern in the darker areas of the ceiling. This was apparently caused by an odd denoising setting. I have therefore adjusted / reduced the denoising so that the odd pattern has now been removed. @Chris Woodrich, Ermell, JayCubby, Famberhorst, Agnes Monkelbaan, Alvesgaspar, MZaplotnik: Please feel free to take another look and let me know if you still support the image under these circumstances. My apologies for not noticing this before the nomination. --Tuxyso (talk) 08:25, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Weak support Looks ok, I'd have rather seen more ceiling than floor and I find it a bit dark overall but still acceptable to me Poco a poco (talk) 10:33, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 14:35, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Weak oppose The relative gloom leaves me a little cold. I'd really like to see this scene again on a sunnier day, when there's warmer light inside. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:44, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Mar 2026 at 16:55:11 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Czech Republic
Info Plaque representing the martyrdom of John of Nepomuk, being touched by a tourist, in the Charles bridge, Prague. Touching the falling priest on the plaque (which the tourist is not really doing...) is supposed to bring good luck and ensure your return. All by Alvesgaspar (talk) 16:55, 4 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 16:55, 4 March 2026 (UTC)
Strong support I really like this picture. It depicts an unusual custom that's unusually common, and portrays a moment that was supposed to be frozen in time still being altered as time goes on – Julian Lupyan (talk) 17:10, 4 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 22:07, 4 March 2026 (UTC)
Support though I'd prefer a more descriptive title. You can see just how much rubbing has affected the plaque. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 02:06, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Beautiful hand with finely painted nails, but she seems to be hiding someone, or doing something different from the expected custom (i.e. "touching" the priest?) At the end it looks like the hand is a big fail, like "oops, there's a bombing hand in front of my sculpture" :-) -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:16, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
Oppose per Basile. --Yann (talk) 10:18, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Different. ★ 22:43, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Support I like this photo purely on a compositional level, regardless of deviation from custom. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:46, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Oppose per Basile. --Екатерина Борисова (talk) 23:14, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Oppose per Basile. //shb (t • c) 11:29, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Mar 2026 at 15:34:32 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Romania
Info all by Pudelek -- Pudelek (talk) 15:34, 2 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Pudelek (talk) 15:34, 2 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 05:55, 3 March 2026 (UTC)
Support I like how the monumental church building fits in the rural ambient. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 10:56, 3 March 2026 (UTC)
Support It is the most accurate view of this church in its category, and the image is well done, with good composition. --Achim Lammerts • Syntaxys (talk) 05:32, 4 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 15:30, 4 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Very good perspective, light and colours, and I love the contrast between the imposing building with its impressive history and the traces of rural decay. – Aristeas (talk) 19:35, 4 March 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 02:08, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:24, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 06:30, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Mar 2026 at 10:16:49 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Traditions
Info all by -- IssamBarhoumi (talk) 10:16, 2 March 2026 (UTC)
Comment Nice but too dark. Yann (talk) 11:01, 2 March 2026 (UTC)
- I improved the light have a look please. IssamBarhoumi (talk) 16:48, 2 March 2026 (UTC)
- I did it again. The whites should be white. I also renamed the file and the nomination. Yann (talk) 07:36, 3 March 2026 (UTC)
- thank you dear Yann IssamBarhoumi (talk) 13:39, 3 March 2026 (UTC)
- I did it again. The whites should be white. I also renamed the file and the nomination. Yann (talk) 07:36, 3 March 2026 (UTC)
- I improved the light have a look please. IssamBarhoumi (talk) 16:48, 2 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Beautiful picture with the new lighting changes – Julian Lupyan (talk) 16:28, 3 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 16:56, 3 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Striking composition, enhanced whites bring elegance and clarity. Blurred background keeps focus firmly on the women, adding depth rather than distraction. Very graceful and visually compelling. -- Radomianin (talk) 22:34, 3 March 2026 (UTC)--
Oppose Original subject but blurry background, unappealing backs (+ mobile phone?) and grey sky. Sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:30, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
Oppose per Basile --Uoaei1 (talk) 09:58, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
Support The gray/grey sky doesn't ruin the photo. ★ 15:07, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
Support per Radomianin and Arion. – Aristeas (talk) 18:45, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 06:30, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:38, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Mar 2026 at 08:44:58 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Strigidae_(True_Owls)
Info All by -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 08:44, 2 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 08:44, 2 March 2026 (UTC)
Comment The "beard" is striking! However, the characteristic reddish-brown mottling is mostly absent. This may be due to the high ISO 32,000 which tends to result in washed-out colours. Do you have an image with better colour, with less noise and without the crop of the tail? Conversion of this high ISO image to b/w may make it more impressive. --Tagooty (talk) 13:17, 2 March 2026 (UTC)
- I do have other images of this trip but mostly front view, this image shows the most of the bird. Check 1 & 2, I can add as alternative if you like. Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 06:31, 3 March 2026 (UTC)
- I like 2, it has some wow-factor -- the branches on either side look like extended wings -- and better image quality. Note: as the two images were taken on a different days and have very different compositions, it should be a fresh nomination, not an alternative (ref the FPC guidelines). Tagooty (talk) 14:31, 3 March 2026 (UTC)
- Thank you, I will nominate that later then. Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 08:08, 4 March 2026 (UTC)
- I like 2, it has some wow-factor -- the branches on either side look like extended wings -- and better image quality. Note: as the two images were taken on a different days and have very different compositions, it should be a fresh nomination, not an alternative (ref the FPC guidelines). Tagooty (talk) 14:31, 3 March 2026 (UTC)
- I do have other images of this trip but mostly front view, this image shows the most of the bird. Check 1 & 2, I can add as alternative if you like. Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 06:31, 3 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Owls are usually not easy to find with good light conditions. I think the quality is ok considering it's at 32000 ISO. If possible, would be even better to have the bottom of the tail uncropped -- Giles Laurent (talk) 16:17, 3 March 2026 (UTC)
- Thank you for understanding, actually the tail was behind the branch, a little more space would have been much better I know. Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 08:17, 4 March 2026 (UTC)
Support per Giles. Yann (talk) 16:58, 3 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 17:25, 3 March 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Not enough quality for a FP, most especially the lack of detail caused by the severe noise. I also don't like the cropped tail. Alvesgaspar (talk) 20:01, 3 March 2026 (UTC)
Support per Giles.--Ermell (talk) 21:37, 3 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Despite high ISO and cropped tail, the owl's posture and expression are striking. -- Radomianin (talk) 22:30, 3 March 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Nice posture, but washed out colours (reddish-brown missing from the mottling), lack of detail and noisy. --Tagooty (talk) 03:10, 4 March 2026 (UTC)
Support per Giles and Radomianin. Honestly I fail to see why the little noise should be so terrible. Sharpness is better than in some recently successful candidates of much easier subjects. Actually the quality is stunning for ISO 32,000 – this would have been impossible a few years ago. – Aristeas (talk) 19:33, 4 March 2026 (UTC)
Oppose The bright sky in the background is disturbing, and it lacks details. --Uoaei1 (talk) 10:00, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 06:30, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Oppose I don't a better shot than this of an owl, but still, I find the background disturbing, it looks sharpness and the cropped tail is also an issue Poco a poco (talk) 10:42, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Mar 2026 at 16:55:32 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Styles and Techniques#Reflections (only) on objects
Info Created, uploaded, and nominated by Julian Lupyan – Julian Lupyan (talk) 16:55, 1 March 2026 (UTC)
Info This picture was taken on one of Las Vegas's characteristic glass-sided pedestrian bridges, on which I was lucky enough to notice this reflection. The image is a single frame, not a composite, and portrays two major casinos in the same picture, even though they are opposite each other. I'm curious to see opinions about this, since it was quite difficult to take and a bit out there. I believe it characterizes the overwhelming and clashing feeling of the Vegas Strip quite well. I'm uncertain which gallery I should put it under, so changes are welcome. Thank you! – Julian Lupyan (talk) 16:55, 1 March 2026 (UTC)
Support – Julian Lupyan (talk) 16:55, 1 March 2026 (UTC)
Comment This image is visually very complex and not easy to "decipher" at the first glance. I think this is what renders it exciting to look at. Just two minor details that I think could be improved: The building on the very right is leaning outward, and the image is lacking geocoding (which is probably relevant in this case). --Aciarium (talk) 18:46, 1 March 2026 (UTC)
Doing… Thank you very much for the pointers, will have this fixed soon – Julian Lupyan (talk) 19:34, 1 March 2026 (UTC)
Done @Aciarium: – Julian Lupyan (talk) 20:15, 1 March 2026 (UTC)
Support @Julian Lupyan: Support per above. Thank you! --Aciarium (talk) 08:49, 2 March 2026 (UTC)
Strong support A really exiting candidate. I love photos which at first glance appear enigmatic and force us to think in order to understand them. At the same time, the shot is also truly attractive and (in my opinion) an impressive representation of the Las Vegas Strip, much better than many of the usual photos, in which the grandiose architecture often appears somewhat banal. – Aristeas (talk) 10:37, 2 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 05:57, 3 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 15:26, 3 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 16:12, 3 March 2026 (UTC)
Comment The nomination is very creative and you’ve captured exactly what you wanted, but the end result isn’t a truly outstanding composition in my opinion because of the distracting objects from the street in the lower part. I prefer a more minimalist approach with only the two casinos in the frame, which was perhaps achievable if you lowered down the camera to move the reflection upwards (I believe it was possible to position the reflection by moving around with the camera as it [the reflection] appears to be quite strong.). Moreover, the picture looks a bit grainy, and there’s slight chromatic aberration on the edges of Belaggio’s building. That’s my opinion. I hope it’s helpful. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 18:11, 3 March 2026 (UTC)
- Thank you for the thoughts Kiril, I agree I should’ve taken another picture composed that way too when I had the chance, that would’ve been a great idea. As for the grain, this was with my old D3500 so the image quality unfortunately couldn’t be as good as my newer pictures. I will do my best on the CA and let you know. – Julian Lupyan (talk) 20:16, 3 March 2026 (UTC)
- @Kiril Simeonovski:
Done Chromatic aberration removed, denoised as far as I could without removing too much detail – Julian Lupyan (talk) 22:36, 3 March 2026 (UTC)
- @Kiril Simeonovski:
- Thank you for the thoughts Kiril, I agree I should’ve taken another picture composed that way too when I had the chance, that would’ve been a great idea. As for the grain, this was with my old D3500 so the image quality unfortunately couldn’t be as good as my newer pictures. I will do my best on the CA and let you know. – Julian Lupyan (talk) 20:16, 3 March 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Nice idea, confusing outcome. Alvesgaspar (talk) 20:13, 3 March 2026 (UTC)
Support This photo captures a fleeting, almost surreal reflection of the Flamingo and Bellagio, compressing the chaos and spectacle of the Las Vegas Strip into a single, striking frame. The interplay of perspective and symmetry transforms a simple reflection into a layered, engaging composition, handled with subtle technical skill, making this a distinctive interpretation of the Strip's energy. -- Radomianin (talk) 20:39, 3 March 2026 (UTC)
Support per Aristeas and Radomianin, you'll remain captivated by this image and attempt to determine what you are seeing. A very intriguing candidate. --Achim Lammerts • Syntaxys (talk) 05:44, 4 March 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Confusing, as Alvesgar already wrote. --Berthold Werner (talk) 14:02, 4 March 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 02:09, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Per above Poco a poco (talk) 10:46, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Mar 2026 at 16:08:22 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Rail vehicles#Australia
Info A Pacific National freight train in Virginia, South Australia. Created by Tomoyn – uploaded by Tomoyn – nominated by Cutlass -- CutlassCiera 16:08, 1 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- CutlassCiera 16:08, 1 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 16:13, 2 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Pudelek (talk) 19:25, 2 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 15:25, 3 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 16:10, 3 March 2026 (UTC)
Oppose -- I fail to see anything extraordinary in this picture. Just a high quality image of a train. Alvesgaspar (talk) 19:51, 3 March 2026 (UTC)
- Does FP require images to have something extraordinary in them? I feel like this argument does not make sense. CutlassCiera 21:17, 3 March 2026 (UTC)
- That is precisely what I think! A featured picture is not (should not be) just a very high quality image, but part of the very best Commons has to offer. Thus, adjectives like extraordinary, exceptional, magic or unique come naturally to my mind when I evaluate a candidate. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 23:18, 3 March 2026 (UTC)
- Does FP require images to have something extraordinary in them? I feel like this argument does not make sense. CutlassCiera 21:17, 3 March 2026 (UTC)
Oppose per Alvesgaspar. This is a perfectly good photo, but all the FPs by Kabelleger and others have set the bar for photos of trains in landscapes very high, and what makes those photos great is that they are not at all merely photos of trains, but photos of great landscapes with trains and often bridges and such in them. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:24, 4 March 2026 (UTC)
- In my opinion, "train in landscape, taken from afar" is almost a cliché at this point for a rail vehicle FA. Considering the number of train FAs fitting that definition, at least for me, this image is more interesting. CutlassCiera 16:29, 4 March 2026 (UTC)
- Great landscape compositions never become boring or mere cliches to me. The idea is absurd to me. Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:50, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
- In my opinion, "train in landscape, taken from afar" is almost a cliché at this point for a rail vehicle FA. Considering the number of train FAs fitting that definition, at least for me, this image is more interesting. CutlassCiera 16:29, 4 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Cutlass has a point here. The image may look boring in the thumbnail, but if I look at it in full size it really impresses me; the train appears imposing, and this is one of the rare case where heat haze/distortion adds to an image, because it increases the dramatic touch of the scene and adds depth to it. – Aristeas (talk) 19:27, 4 March 2026 (UTC)
Oppose per others (COM:I: Featured pictures candidates should meet all the following requirements, must have a "wow factor"). Aristeas notices the thumbnail looks "boring", but at full size the empty foreground becomes too dominant in my view -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:50, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
Support I don't agree with the opposers. The mirage in this picture is really special. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 14:25, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 9 Mar 2026 at 21:36:07 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications/Germany#Bavaria
Info Plassenburg Castle in Kulmbach seen from the southwest. All by me -- Ermell (talk) 21:36, 28 February 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Ermell (talk) 21:36, 28 February 2026 (UTC)
Support Composition, light and architecture -- Basile Morin (talk) 07:14, 1 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 07:21, 1 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 14:04, 1 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Pleasant view and composition. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:45, 1 March 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry, but the bottom crop is too tight, the cropped road on the left side is distracting and the composition would benefit from more sky. I think the subject is featurable if captured from greater distance. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 18:00, 1 March 2026 (UTC)
Comment Just one more of the German castles. We have many of them featured. I miss something like Chinese pagodas… ★ 19:17, 1 March 2026 (UTC)
Support More crop at the bottom would make it look more unbalanced because of the extra wide angle. Looks fine to me. Of course, ArionStar, I always appreciate more diversity in the subjects, I indeed try to contribute my grain of sand there (not China, but other exotic destinations) Poco a poco (talk) 19:26, 1 March 2026 (UTC)
- Why not China? ★ 19:30, 1 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 01:59, 2 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Milseburg (talk) 20:57, 2 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 16:10, 3 March 2026 (UTC)
Support as per Basile. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:21, 3 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 15:27, 4 March 2026 (UTC)
Support per Ikan and Poco a Poco. – Aristeas (talk) 19:23, 4 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:40, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:21, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Support The crop and composition works for me very well. --Achim Lammerts • Syntaxys (talk) 11:38, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Mar 2026 at 19:20:06 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals#Class_:_Gastropoda
Info Nudibranch (Felimare picta webbi) surrounded by seeweed (Dictyota dichotoma), Teno-Rasca marine strip, Tenerife, Spain. Felimare picta lives on rocky seabeds throughout the Mediterranean Sea, European waters, the Eastern North Atlantic Ocean and the Gulf of Mexico in depths between 0–55 metres (0–180 ft). They are usually 10–15 centimetres (3.9–5.9 in) long and feed mainly on sponges of the genus Dysidea. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 19:20, 28 February 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 19:20, 28 February 2026 (UTC)
Support Pretty. Could you add a category for at least the most prominent seaweed? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:47, 1 March 2026 (UTC)
- Ikan Kekek:
Done, thanks Poco a poco (talk) 19:48, 1 March 2026 (UTC)
- Ikan Kekek:
Support --Yann (talk) 16:12, 2 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 15:25, 3 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 16:09, 3 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 15:26, 4 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Incredible creature, good photo. – Aristeas (talk) 19:22, 4 March 2026 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Mar 2026 at 05:33:05 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings/Ceilings#Switzerland
Info ILanz, Reformierte Kirche Ilanz, (decorative vaulted ceiling.) Decorative vaulted ceiling of the old church in Lanz (a national monument, built in 1494). The decorations depict symbols of the evangelists.
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:33, 28 February 2026 (UTC){{*-- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:33, 28 February 2026 (UTC)I choose the alternative photo.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:50, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Support
Oppose Sorry, but IMHO several things here are not up to FP. First of all, that bar in the middle of the image, that's a dealbreaker. Furthermore I find the ceiling too simple, and if there is an interesting spot that's the one at the top that has been cropped. Poco a poco (talk) 12:22, 28 February 2026 (UTC)
Comment Thank you for your comment about my photo. It's about an old, small church from 1494. The beam you're referring to is one of the tie rods (wall anchors) that hold the exterior walls together. That's part of the church. You also find the decoration too simple. Tastes differ, but I find these religious depictions beautiful and very refined. I've added another photo as an alternative; perhaps the decoration will look better in that one.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:16, 28 February 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Good quality. The use of a tripod here was very efficient. Unfortunately the bar in the middle is distracting, the wow factor low in my subjective view, and I agree with Poco the composition is not breathtaking -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:58, 1 March 2026 (UTC)
Alternative
Info with a different distribution of the decoration.
Support I like this one better.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:52, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Much better imo and the beams for some reason are not distracting in this version. —UnpetitproleX (Talk) 00:57, 1 March 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Good quality. The use of a tripod here was very efficient. Unfortunately the two bars are distracting, the wow factor low in my subjective view, and the angle of view not special enough -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:58, 1 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Works for me. The ceiling is beautiful, esp. the colours, the quality is fine, and I can easily ignore the bars, probably because their simple shape is so different from all forms of the ceiling. – Aristeas (talk) 19:22, 4 March 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Better compo but now we have 2 very disturbing bars, --Poco a poco (talk) 10:48, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Timetable (day 5 after nomination)
Wed 04 Mar → Mon 09 Mar Thu 05 Mar → Tue 10 Mar Fri 06 Mar → Wed 11 Mar Sat 07 Mar → Thu 12 Mar Sun 08 Mar → Fri 13 Mar Mon 09 Mar → Sat 14 Mar
Timetable (day 9 after nomination, last day of voting)
Sat 28 Feb → Mon 09 Mar Sun 01 Mar → Tue 10 Mar Mon 02 Mar → Wed 11 Mar Tue 03 Mar → Thu 12 Mar Wed 04 Mar → Fri 13 Mar Thu 05 Mar → Sat 14 Mar Fri 06 Mar → Sun 15 Mar Sat 07 Mar → Mon 16 Mar Sun 08 Mar → Tue 17 Mar Mon 09 Mar → Wed 18 Mar
Closing nominations manually
The following description explains how to close nominations manually. Normally this is not necessary, as FPCBot takes care of counting the votes, closing and archiving the nominations. When the Bot has counted the votes, a user needs to check and approve the result; everything else is done by the Bot. Therefore, the following instructions are normally only needed for delist-and-replace nominations that the Bot cannot (yet) process, and in case the Bot malfunctions. The closing can be done by any experienced user. If you need help, just ask on the FPC talk page.
Closing a featured picture nomination
- On Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the nomination, then [edit].
- Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line):
{{FPC-results-reviewed|support=x|oppose=x|neutral=x|featured=(“yes” or “no”)|gallery=xxx|sig=~~~~}}
(You can leave thegalleryparameter blank if the image was not featured. If the nomination contains alternatives, you must add thealternative=xxxparameter with the name of the selected image between thegalleryand thesigparameter. See {{FPC-results-reviewed}} for examples and more explanations.) - Edit the title of the nomination and add
featuredornot featuredafter the link – for example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
becomes
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], featured === - Save your edit.
- Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line):
- If it is featured:
- Add the picture to the list of the four most recently featured pictures of an appropriate gallery of Commons:Featured pictures, list as the first one and delete the last one, so that the number is four again.
- Add the picture to the appropriate featured picture gallery page and section. Click on the most appropriate link beneath where you just added it as one of the four images on Commons:Featured pictures, list to find the gallery page, and search for the correct section. (An image should only appear ONE time in the galleries. After a successful nomination, the image can be placed in several of the Featured pictures categories.)
- Add the template
{{Assessments|featured=1}}to the image description page.- If it was an alternative image or part of a set nomination, use the
com-nomparameter. For example, if File:Foo.jpg was promoted in the nominationCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bar.jpg, use{{Assessments|featured=1|com-nom=Bar.jpg}}You also need thecom-nomparameter if the image gets renamed. - If the image is already featured on another Wikipedia, just add
featured=1to the {{Assessments}} template. For instance,{{Assessments|enwiki=1}}becomes{{Assessments|enwiki=1|featured=1}}
- If it was an alternative image or part of a set nomination, use the
- Head over to the structured data for the image and add the “Commons quality assessment” claim (P6731) “Wikimedia Commons featured picture” (Q63348049).
- Add the picture to the chronological archives of featured pictures. Place it at the end of the gallery using this format:
File:xxxxx.jpg|# '''Title'''<br>created by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], uploaded by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]<br> {{s|xxx}}, {{o|xxx}}, {{n|xxx}}- The
#should be replaced by 1 for the first image nominated that month, and counts up after that. Have a look at the other entries on that page for examples. (If you want to do everything perfectly, link that number to the nomination subpage, just like FPCBot does this. It allows users to jump directly to the nomination.) - The
Titleshould be replaced by the bare name of the featured picture, without the ‘File:’ or the file extension (such as .jpg .tif .svg). - The
xin{{s|x}}, {{o|x}}, {{n|x}}should be replaced by the count of support, oppose, and neutral votes respectively. - If the nomination was a set nomination, use this format:
File:xxxxx.jpg|# '''Set: Title (Z files)'''<br>created by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], uploaded by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]<br> {{s|x}}, {{o|x}}, {{n|x}}
Replace theZin(Z files)by the count of images in the set, and use the name of the first image from the set instead ofFile:xxxxx.jpgand for the title.
- The
- Add
== FP promotion ==
{{FPpromotion|File:XXXXX.jpg}}to the talk page of the nominator. For set nominations, use:== Set Promoted to FP ==, using the names of the set files instead of the XXXXXX and the title of the set instead of YYYYY.
<gallery>
File:XXXXXX.jpg
File:XXXXXX.jpg
</gallery>
{{FPpromotionSet2|YYYYY}} - Add
== FP promotion ==
{{FPpromotedUploader|File:XXXXX.jpg}}to the talk page of the user who has uploaded the image, if that user is not the same as the nominator. - Add
== FP promotion ==
{{FPpromotedCreator|File:XXXXX.jpg}}to the talk page of the creator, if the author is a different Commons user than nominator and uploader.
- As the last step (whether the image is featured or not; including {{FPX}}-d, {{FPD}}-d and {{Withdraw}}-n nominations), you have to move the transclusion (the {{ }} and the text within those) of the nomination to the current log page.
- To find the current log page, visit the first page of the log for this month. If the header of that page contains a link with the text “Next part of this month”, the log for this month has been split into several parts because it contains too many entries. Click on the “Next part …” link and repeat this until you reach a page where the header does not offer a “Next part …” link; that’s the last and current log page.
- Now open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination you are closing. It will be of the form:
{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}or:{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/XXXXX}}. - Copy that line to the bottom of the current log page and save that page. Then remove the same line from the candidate list and save that page.
Closing a delisting nomination
- On Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line):{{FPC-delist-results-reviewed|delist=x|keep=x|neutral=x|delisted=yes/no|sig=~~~~}}
(for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/File:Ensifera ensifera (22271195865).jpg) - Edit the title of the delisting nomination and add
delistedornot delistedafter the image title; for example:=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
becomes=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], delisted === - Move the transclusion of the nomination to the current log page; please see above for an explanation how to find the current log page and how to move the nomination to it.
- If the outcome was not delisted, stop here. If it is delisted:
- Remove the picture from Commons:Featured pictures, list and any subpages.
- Edit the picture's description as follows:
- In the {{Assessments}} template on the image description page, change
featured=1tofeatured=2(do not remove the {{Assessments}} template; do not change anything related to its status in other featured picture processes). If the image description page uses the old {{Featured picture}} template, replace it with{{Assessments|featured=2}}. - Remove the image from all categories beginning with "Featured [pictures]" (example: Featured night photography, Featured pictures from Wiki Loves Monuments 2016, Featured pictures of Paris); but not from categories about featured pictures on specific Wikipedia editions, like Category:Featured pictures on Wikipedia, English.
- Remove the "Commons quality assessment" claim (P6731) "Wikimedia Commons featured picture" (Q63348049) from the picture's Structured data.
- In the {{Assessments}} template on the image description page, change
- Add a delisting-comment to the original entry in the chronological archive of featured pictures in bold-face, e. g. delisted 2007-07-19 (1–6) with (1–6) meaning 1 keep and 6 delist votes (change as appropriate). The picture must not be removed from the chronological archives.
- If this is a Delist and Replace, the delisting and promotion must both be done manually. To do the promotion, follow the steps in the section above. Note that the assessment tag on the file page and the promotion tag on the nominator's talk page won't pick up the /replace subpage that these nominations use.
Archiving a withdrawn nomination
If a nomination has been withdrawn by the nominator by using {{Withdraw}} or is cancelled with {{FPX}} or {{FPD}}, wait 24 hours after the nomination was last edited. If there has been no objection to the cancellation within this time, the nomination can simply be archived. Just move the transclusion of the nomination to the current log page; please see above for an explanation how to find the current log page and how to move the nomination to it.
